Volume 8, Issue 4 (1-2023)
فصلنامه تحقیقات بنیادین علوم انسانی 2023, 8(4): 145-145 |
Back to browse issues page
Abstract: (814 Views)
xploring the truth of religious science in the field of humanities/political-Islamic sciences indicates a chaotic situation that has arisen from the disagreement of thinkers on the authenticity and validity of these sciences and how to attribute them to Islam. Finding the root of this disorder, the researcher is familiar with factors such as; Underdevelopment, inefficiency, lack of epistemological independence, passivity and influence against the hegemonic power of secular and positivist Western sciences lead to the dominance of subjectivity and abstractionism, lack of social extension and methodological chaos. Although it is difficult to focus on one factor, but in the weight of measurement and comparison, it is possible to arrive at certain indicators for the preference of a factor in the formation of the "crisis of attribution of political science to Islam". Based on the theoretical framework and analytical method of "Crisis Theory", the hypothesis of the effect of methodological confusion was highlighted in the creation and deepening of the crisis of the authenticity of Islamic political sciences and their logical attribution to religion, and with the motivation of providing relief and helping political sciences in solving the "epistemological identity crisis" He considers the method of religious ijtihad at the level of Islamic inventive sciences such as "jurisprudence" to be the best reference and method model for the production of religious science and Islamization of political sciences and crisis resolution.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |