XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Taheri M. Justice and Human Nature; a comparative study of Ayatollah Javavdi Amoli's and John Rawls's thoughts. فصلنامه تحقیقات بنیادین علوم انسانی 2018; 4 (2) :107-132
URL: http://frh.sccsr.ac.ir/article-1-89-en.html
Ph.D in political thought, Imam Sadiq University, Iran, Tehran.
Abstract:   (1579 Views)
 
Abstract
Each theory of justice is based on assumptions about human nature. To advance an Islamic theory of justice, then, needs to define human propensities, rights and capacities. This research considers and compares  Ayatollah Javavdi Amoli and John Rawls's viewpoints on human nature, and its relation with justice. Javavdi Amoli believes that human being has two dimensions –Fitrah and (material)nature- and the Fitrah should dominate the (material) nature of man. This belief has significant implications (e.g. the right of guidance) for theorizing about justice. Rawls, on the other hand, concentrates on human characteristics such as liberty, equality, rationality and reasonability, with the centrality of the liberty. He finally articulates his theory of justice in two principles, which the first and dominant one is the right of liberty.
Full-Text [PDF 701 kb]   (714 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
ePublished: 2018/09/22

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.