Volume 9, Issue 3 (11-2023)
فصلنامه تحقیقات بنیادین علوم انسانی 2023, 9(3): 132-132 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ajamein M, Azarbayjani M. Philosophical methodology of counseling science with a view to Islamic philosophy. فصلنامه تحقیقات بنیادین علوم انسانی 2023; 9 (3) :132-132
URL: http://frh.sccsr.ac.ir/article-1-570-en.html
URL: http://frh.sccsr.ac.ir/article-1-570-en.html
Abstract: (2443 Views)
The aim of this study was to investigate the methods used in counseling and its evaluation. In this research, the texts of the research method in the science of counseling were examined and the methods used in this science were examined, and then the method and approach of Islamic philosophy were evaluated with a philosophical view. Therefore, in this study, the hermeneutic method and content analysis were used to identify the methods used in science and the philosophical method was used to evaluate the methods. The findings showed that non-research methods are not documented on a specific philosophical basis and are not useful for extracting science propositions. Research methods based on positivist, interpretive and pragmatist approaches are divided into three methods: quantitative, qualitative and mixed, each of which has several research methods. In general, none of these methods from the Islamic point of view can provide complete certainty, but each of them can gain some level of confidence according to the rules governing the empirical method from the Islamic point of view. In quantitative methods the experimental method, in qualitative methods the Consensual Research and in the mixed methods the Triangulation Design have the most validity.
Keywords: Methodology, counseling, Islamic philosophy, quantitative method, qualitative method, Mixed method.
References
1. Bager and McBeath, A. 2020. Enjoying Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy. Springer International Publishing.
2. Balkin and Kleist, D. M. 2017. Counseling Research: A Scholar-Practitioner Approach. American Counseling Association.
3. Barker, C., Pistrang, N., and Elliott, R. 2015. Research methods in clinical psychology: An introduction for students and practitioners. John Wiley and Sons.
4. Bunge and Ardila, R. 1987. Philosophy of Psychology. Springer: New York.
5. Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research designs. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches.
6. Heppner and Kivlighan, D. M., and Wampold, B. E. 1992. Research design in counseling. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks. Co/e.
7. Hergenhahn, B. R. 2008. An Introduction to the History of Psychology: Wadsworth Publishing.
8. McLeod, J. 2011. “Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy”. Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy, pp. 1-352.
9. Sheperis, Young, J. S., Daniels, M. H. 2010. Counseling research_ quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods-Pearson Education, Pearson: Merrill.
10. Thomas and Hersen M. 2003. Understanding Research in Clinical and Counseling Psychology: Routledge.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
