Volume 11, Issue 1 (6-2025)
فصلنامه تحقیقات بنیادین علوم انسانی 2025, 11(1): 68-68 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Golkar M H, Golkar M A, Golkar F. Realizing the Civilization-Building Scientific Authority of the Revolution
Reconfiguring the Humanities with the Model of Systemic-Religious Theorizing. فصلنامه تحقیقات بنیادین علوم انسانی 2025; 11 (1) :68-68
URL: http://frh.sccsr.ac.ir/article-1-638-en.html
URL: http://frh.sccsr.ac.ir/article-1-638-en.html
Institute of Strategic Studies of Islamic Sciences and Teachings
Abstract: (13 Views)
The realization of the new Islamic civilization and the attainment of scientific authority depends on transcending Western secular humanities, which are built solely upon instrumental rationality and materialistic anthropology. The main problem of this research is how to move beyond the crisis of ineffectiveness in existing structures and to present a valid method for extracting the “software of governing society” from religious sources. This study, using an analytical–inferential method and drawing on the logic of “systemic modeling,” while critiquing rival paradigms (the secular approach and the purificatory approach), elucidates the theory of “systemic-religious theorizing.” The findings of the research show that although the modern humanities in the West, by moving beyond crude positivism, have turned to multidimensional models (biological, psychological, social, and spiritual) and have acknowledged the role of religion in “giving meaning” to life, this attention has mostly remained at a “functional” and “psychological” level. Based on philosophical foundations and the views of thinkers such as Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, while accepting non-contradictory scientific achievements and avoiding a monolithic view of the West, the distinguishing point of this study lies in the transition from the “human in need of meaning” to the “networked human.” In this paradigm, the human being is not merely seeking psychological calm; rather, he is defined as a being whose felicity depends on the precise regulation of real connections with the tawhidi and unseen network—connections that are governed not by spiritual tastes, but by the “revelatory software” and the ontological laws of the world. The results indicate that by utilizing “systemic ijtihad” and activating the capacities of fiqh, religious propositions can be transformed into operational models; a strategy that is the primary condition for moving from the consumption of knowledge to the production of a civilization-building scientific authority.
Keywords: Networked human, model of human needs, systemic modeling, religious theorizing, Islamic humanities, scientific authority, new Islamic civilization.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
