Abstract
The question of this study comes from scrutiny on the effects of reducing anthropological, ontological and epistemological foundations in the Western’s organization theory and management theory. Accordingly, by tracking this reduction of foundations, it is shown that the “competition” is the main incentive and pivotal Etebar in the field of organization and in the tripartite modern, symbolic and postmodern perspective. Then, by “ontological subjectology” approach and using a variety of research methods appropriate with one of the aspects of Etebariat area and using thematic analysis technique, “Qerabat” is identified and then is introduced as the pivotal Etebar in the Islamic management. The results show that in the Islamic thought, the perfection is nearness to God Almighty, the nearness in the core depends on subordination of the Imamate and in the appearance depends on sketching social interaction on the characteristics of the family relationship. With the discovery of “Qerabat” as the pivotal Etebar, “unconditional bounty” is derived as one of the leading examples of the pivotal role of “Qerabat” in the building aspect of Etebariat methodology. Its affects on the organization plan is investigated by the three components of complexity, focus and formality in the change aspect of Etebariat methodology.

Abstract
"Structure and agency" are among the most important theoretical and fundamental issues in contemporary sociology. Each structure and agency have their own characteristics. The need to pay attention to these two elements in the explanation of social phenomena has led to the emergence of diverse views, each of which, through a different process, seeks to preserve the authenticity of one or both of them in a social theory. This paper uses the comparative method to explore the common and distinct elements of the three theories related to the problem of "structure and agency relationship". Three theories that want to consider the both. The theories discussed are the theory of "structuration" Giddens', the theory of "Morphogenesis" archer, and the theory of the "personality- collective –relationship authenticity" zahed. Meanwhile, Zahed's theory provides a more comprehensive explanation of the relationship between structure and agency. The result of the comparison between these theories is that the mechanism of communication between structure and agency, based on the religious references contained in Zahed's theory (as a Muslim sociologist), can show how the agency is to the structure of communication And how the structure is related to agency.