<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.0//EN" "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query/static/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>عطاء الله رفیعی آتانی</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>The Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Fundamental Researches on Humanities</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2476-745x</Issn>
<Volume>6</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus = "ppublish">
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>


	<ArticleTitle>The Structure of  the Soul and Body  As a Model for the Quality of Human Dominance over Nature</ArticleTitle>
	<FirstPage>7</FirstPage>
	<LastPage>28</LastPage>
	<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
	<Author>
	<FirstName></FirstName>
	<LastName></LastName>
	<Affiliation></Affiliation>
	 </Author>


</AuthorList>
<Abstract>Man, perforce, needs to dominate nature to fashion artifacts or meet his other needs. On the other hand, humane possessions and dominance over nature cannot be unconditional and befall in any form, but rather, must adhere to established ends and boundaries. Now, with all these in mind, the question arises, how should the quality of human dominance over nature be? The answer to this question can be pursued from various perspectives. In this article, we attempt to address a suggestion by proposing an anthropological approach, and this anthropological approach aims to resolve the major axes of human dominance on nature by referring to the structure of human creation. Understanding human beings and the principles that rule them can illustrate how we deal with the world at large, given how artifactualization and dominance are solely granted to the man. Two respective methods have been proposed to demonstrate the sense of dominating over nature and facing artifactualization. First suggested method maintains that defining the structure reigning over body and soul through the connection between, again, one&#39;s body and essence (soul) renders the extent of man&#39;s nature dominance and the quality of human interactions with nature and artifacts. Meanwhile, the second suggested method is conducted through discerning the general mechanisms ruling the human physical realm. In this way, a series of prevailing rules that refer to facing nature are inferred by pondering the principles governing the human physical body. This discussion can be further employed as a foundation concerning technology issue based on a philosophical approach.</Abstract>


</Article>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>عطاء الله رفیعی آتانی</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>The Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Fundamental Researches on Humanities</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2476-745x</Issn>
<Volume>6</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus = "ppublish">
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>


	<ArticleTitle>Critical Review of Conventional Theories of Motivation; Towards Growth Theory</ArticleTitle>
	<FirstPage>29</FirstPage>
	<LastPage>58</LastPage>
	<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
	<Author>
	<FirstName></FirstName>
	<LastName></LastName>
	<Affiliation></Affiliation>
	 </Author>


	<Author>
	<FirstName></FirstName>
	<LastName></LastName>
	<Affiliation></Affiliation>
	 </Author>


	<Author>
	<FirstName></FirstName>
	<LastName></LastName>
	<Affiliation></Affiliation>
	 </Author>


</AuthorList>
<Abstract>The categorizing, critique and analysis of different theories in a field is the beginning of the introduction of new theories. In the present study, which is based on the concept of motivation in management, while introducing the two main categories of motivation theories, namely the subjective and objective categories, an attempt was made to find the most important roots of the theory in each category. Subjective theories are radically divided into four categories: emotion-oriented, cognitive-oriented, need-oriented, and personality-oriented. Then, using the critical analytical method, the literature was reviewed and after analyzing the roots of each of the theories, the criticisms were organized into four main categories, which include &#34;ontology&#34;, &#34;anthropology&#34;, &#34;Epistemology and methodology&#34; and &#34;the dominant issue and their general interpretation of the organization&#34;. In order to fully achieve the goal of the research and achieve a comprehensive critical review in the field of motivation that has both negative and positive dimensions, in addition to criticizing the theories, the &#8220;tendency-oriented&#8221; theory and its differences with the aforementioned theories was discussed.</Abstract>


</Article>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>عطاء الله رفیعی آتانی</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>The Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Fundamental Researches on Humanities</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2476-745x</Issn>
<Volume>6</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus = "ppublish">
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>


	<ArticleTitle>Philosophy of political ethics in Islam (Concepts, The nature and Framework of Issues)</ArticleTitle>
	<FirstPage>59</FirstPage>
	<LastPage>80</LastPage>
	<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
	<Author>
	<FirstName></FirstName>
	<LastName></LastName>
	<Affiliation></Affiliation>
	 </Author>


</AuthorList>
<Abstract>This article examines the Philosophy of political ethics in Islam as an interdisciplinary trend and seeks to answer some of its key questions. Although political ethics has a long history in Islamic culture and civilization, and its methods and sources have been defined under the knowledge of ethics, its interdisciplinary aspect has been neglected and most of the moral precepts of Islam related to politics have been considered. This paper seeks to explore the fundamental questions of political ethics, such as concept, background, subject, method, utility, purpose, Framework of Issues and the relationship between political ethics and other knowledge and trends. The answers given to the questions posed indicate that political ethics has a high potential for growth and excellence and becoming an independent knowledge in Islamic political thought. This important task has been done by descriptive-analytical method and using the questions of philosophy of science and second order view.</Abstract>


</Article>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>عطاء الله رفیعی آتانی</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>The Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Fundamental Researches on Humanities</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2476-745x</Issn>
<Volume>6</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus = "ppublish">
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>


	<ArticleTitle>The Islamic Republic of Iran; the Government - the Moral Citizen or the Government - the Lawful Citizen?</ArticleTitle>
	<FirstPage>81</FirstPage>
	<LastPage>106</LastPage>
	<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
	<Author>
	<FirstName></FirstName>
	<LastName></LastName>
	<Affiliation></Affiliation>
	 </Author>


</AuthorList>
<Abstract>Because in today&#39;s world, on the one hand, citizenship is in the shadow of the government or in the hostage state, and on the other hand, it is the citizens who give identity to governments, so we can see all kinds of governments and types of citizenship because the iron &#160;government; can promote a &#34;soldier citizen&#34; or a &#34;restricted citizen&#34; and be a sponge government promote a &#34;guaranteed citizen&#34; or a &#34;free citizen based on the rule&#34;.
After all, the status of citizenship in today&#39;s Iran can be a problem for us. Therefore, the main question is in which government-citizen is the government-citizen in the Islamic Republic of Iran with her characteristics and position?
Are placed; A mere moral or a mere law?
The author&#39;s claim, based on the method of comparative study, is that although Some have tried to make the a mere moral government -citizen, and some have tried to create a mere law government-citizen And they do.
But they have faced problems, the solution to which is to select and choice &#160;a cohesive government-citizen, Which can be obtained from the constitution and the words of the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran.</Abstract>


</Article>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>عطاء الله رفیعی آتانی</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>The Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Fundamental Researches on Humanities</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2476-745x</Issn>
<Volume>6</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus = "ppublish">
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>


	<ArticleTitle>Feasibility Study of Enforcement  of Important and more Important Rule in the Conflict of Rights</ArticleTitle>
	<FirstPage>107</FirstPage>
	<LastPage>128</LastPage>
	<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
	<Author>
	<FirstName></FirstName>
	<LastName></LastName>
	<Affiliation></Affiliation>
	 </Author>


</AuthorList>
<Abstract>In various issues of knowledge of jurisprudence, there are two rights that the obligated person is not able to fulfill both rights, these issues can be collected under a single heading called &#8220;Conflict of rights&#8221;. The conflict of rights and its preferences has not been studied independently in the knowledge of principles, and in the knowledge of jurisprudence, only disjointed and decentralized data can be found in some branches of jurisprudence.
The lack of an independent theory of the principles of conflict of rights has made jurists to use the law called important and more important, which is recommended in the knowledge of the principles in order to get out of the conflicts. The problem here is that the important law (what is important and more important) is based on certain principles, according to which its application in the conflict of rights faces obstacles.
What are the basics of the law and what are the problems in using each type of conflict of rights to use it, this is an issue that this research has addressed and has tried to use jurisprudential methods and principles of jurisprudence; relying on the sources of knowledge of jurisprudence and principles of jurisprudence to conclude that in the conflict of financial rights it is not possible to implement the law of important (what is important and more important), But it is possible to use it in the conflict of non-financial rights.</Abstract>


</Article>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>عطاء الله رفیعی آتانی</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>The Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Fundamental Researches on Humanities</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2476-745x</Issn>
<Volume>6</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus = "ppublish">
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>


	<ArticleTitle>Analytical study of resources, sciences and methods related to the interdisciplinary methodology of "Studies of (Social) Currents"</ArticleTitle>
	<FirstPage>129</FirstPage>
	<LastPage>172</LastPage>
	<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
	<Author>
	<FirstName></FirstName>
	<LastName></LastName>
	<Affiliation></Affiliation>
	 </Author>


</AuthorList>
<Abstract>&#34;Multifacetedness&#34; of issues requires &#34;multidimensionality&#34; of approaches and angles of study and research in terms of epistemology and methodology; therefore, it is not possible to identify complex phenomena except with integrated and interdisciplinary approaches. Social Current is also one of the social realities that has a multifaceted identity.
This is because, according to the chosen definition, Current is a dynamic and fluid social reality with an unofficial systemic identity that consists of a set of principles and epistemological assumptions (= common semantic system) on which a systematic (= managed) population operates and influences. Therefore, in order to know it scientifically and to improve the &#34;Currents studies&#34; of journalism products to knowledge, we need to refine its methodology.
Interdisciplinary studies use the insights of specialized disciplines and methods to understand a complex phenomenon on a regular and methodical basis. One of the important steps in the process of these studies is the selection of knowledge and methods related to the subject (potentially related) so that the researcher can achieve theoretical adequacy in the subject by exploring them. If the methods and knowledge involved in recognizing the dimensions of the complex subject are not well calculated, explored and studied, the result of the study will be equally flawed and inefficient.
This article was written using a descriptive-analytical method as well as using library resources. It seeks to identify and study the resources, sciences, and methods required for the interdisciplinary study of Currents studies and show the place of each in the research process.&#160; In this way, a step can be taken to refine the methodology of Currentology. According to this study, the methods, sciences, and epistemological resources required in Currents studies can generally be categorized into three categories: &#34;template package&#34;, &#34;content package&#34; and &#34;method package&#34;.</Abstract>


</Article>
</ArticleSet>
