<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.0//EN" "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query/static/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>عطاء الله رفیعی آتانی</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>The Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Fundamental Researches on Humanities</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2476-745x</Issn>
<Volume>2</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus = "ppublish">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>


	<ArticleTitle>Methodological differences between religious science and current science</ArticleTitle>
	<FirstPage>7</FirstPage>
	<LastPage>24</LastPage>
	<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
	<Author>
	<FirstName>S.M.R. </FirstName>
	<LastName>Taghavi</LastName>
	<Affiliation>Department of Clinical Psychology and The Institute for Humanities and Social Science Development, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran</Affiliation>
	 </Author>


</AuthorList>
<Abstract>Abstract
Methodology is one of the important pillars of religious scientific discipline. Although, In terms of the sequence, Identifying of methods of scientific research is a function of general philosophy in a scientific discipline, however, on the other hand, could be constitutive of each other. The aim of this study was to compare the methodology of religious science and current science which ended to detecting 8 differences. Key differences between religious science and current science including: Philosophical foundations, human goals and ends, theoretical and operational definition of variables, hypotheses developing, correctness criterion of the hypothesis, studying the deeper layers of phenomena, using a variety of research methods and identifying subjects system. Finally, a diagram was presented to introduce the methodology from the perspective of religious science.</Abstract>


</Article>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>عطاء الله رفیعی آتانی</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>The Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Fundamental Researches on Humanities</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2476-745x</Issn>
<Volume>2</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus = "ppublish">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>


	<ArticleTitle>Introduction to the Role of Official System of Islamic Education and Training in Providing Human Resources</ArticleTitle>
	<FirstPage>25</FirstPage>
	<LastPage>54</LastPage>
	<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
	<Author>
	<FirstName>Valiollah</FirstName>
	<LastName>Naghipour Far </LastName>
	<Affiliation>The Faculty Member of University of Qom</Affiliation>
	 </Author>


</AuthorList>
<Abstract>Abstract
The official system of education and training in Islam, based on growth levels, has 4 stages which each one of them lasts for 6 and 7 years; 6 years old period refers to girls and 7 years old period refers to boys.
&#160;The first 6 and 7 years of life starting from the stage of embryo formation is a fundamental stage in this Islamic &#160;education and training that unfortunately it was neglected in &#8220;Fundamental Reform Document of Education in the Islamik Republic of Iran&#8221;.
Acceptable resources of organizations have characteristic compound of valuable humanity and professional identity .
&#160;Islamic official system of education and training, takes the reasponsibility of formation these two identities, in quadruple phases based on growth levels.
&#160;First and second phase, takes the reasponsibility of &#160;identity valuable humanity formation &#160;which is based on the centrality of the Holy Quran,s music and content.
&#160;Third phase, takes the reasponsibility of professional identity formation , based on the centrality of family and job for labor market and life.
&#160;Fourth phase refers to elite training and spreading &#160;of knowledge and science bounderies and producing it.</Abstract>


</Article>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>عطاء الله رفیعی آتانی</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>The Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Fundamental Researches on Humanities</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2476-745x</Issn>
<Volume>2</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus = "ppublish">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>


	<ArticleTitle>From Practical Wisdom to Conventional Perceptions (I tibariat)
AllamehTabatabai and Philosophical Grounding For The Islamic  Human Sciences</ArticleTitle>
	<FirstPage>55</FirstPage>
	<LastPage>78</LastPage>
	<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
	<Author>
	<FirstName>Malek</FirstName>
	<LastName>Shojaei Jeshvaghani</LastName>
	<Affiliation>Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies</Affiliation>
	 </Author>


</AuthorList>
<Abstract>Abstract 
this essay review &#160;the origins of &#160;problem of possibility of Islamic And indigenous human sciences and Literature of this issue in in the West , Muslim world, and contemporary Iran (with an emphasis on three decades after the Islamic Revolution).Given that the Basic problem in the current Discussion is Theoretical questions from the islamic philosophical tradition point of view, in the second part, by a comparative study of philosophy of Human Sciences in Wilhelm Dilthey (1833-1911), a German Philosopher &#160;and one of the Founders of The continental philosophy of Humanities with the possibilities and limitations of the Islamic intellectual tradition , Review the short History of practical Wisdom in Islamic philosophy and Analyse the possibilities and Limitations of Theory of conventional perceptions (I tibariat) in regard to Diltheys philosophical Grounding for the Human sciences.</Abstract>


</Article>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>عطاء الله رفیعی آتانی</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>The Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Fundamental Researches on Humanities</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2476-745x</Issn>
<Volume>2</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus = "ppublish">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>


	<ArticleTitle>Analyzing the Non-Cognitive Foundations of Action in the Form of Conceptual Models(Based on MullaSadra’s Viewpoints)</ArticleTitle>
	<FirstPage>79</FirstPage>
	<LastPage>104</LastPage>
	<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
	<Author>
	<FirstName>Mehran</FirstName>
	<LastName>Rezaee</LastName>
	<Affiliation>Ph.d Student in Transcendent Wisdom, University of Isfahan (Corresponding Author</Affiliation>
	 </Author>


	<Author>
	<FirstName>Hosain</FirstName>
	<LastName> Hooshangi</LastName>
	<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Imam Sadiq University, Department of Islamic Philosophy</Affiliation>
	 </Author>


	<Author>
	<FirstName>Zahra</FirstName>
	<LastName> Tabarraei </LastName>
	<Affiliation>Master of Philosophy of Islamic Education, University of Mazandaran</Affiliation>
	 </Author>


</AuthorList>
<Abstract>Abstract 
The study of &#8220;non-cognitive foundation of action&#8221; in the realm of &#8220;philosophy of action&#8221; based on MullaSadra&#8217;s works is a new and fundamental step of Islamic philosophy to participate in new emerging issues. The special issue of this research is to explain those non-cognitive foundations which influence human actions and to explain the roles of each foundation and their relations with each other and with cognitive faculties.
According to the scope of this study, seven principles of non-cognitive foundations of human actions are examined based on MullaSadra&#8217;s viewpoints: 1. Love: Love is the cause of demanding the action and its issuance (execution) and as the result of the loving process, the lover&#8217;s soul is transformed and changed and then the action is issued (executed) as a result of lover&#8217;s alliance with beloved&#8217;s soul. In another method, moreover, the lover&#8217;s issuance of action happens due to favorability of resembling to beloved and is recognized the main driver of all actions; 2. Dispositions of Souls: there is a dialectical relationship between actions and dispositions which could strengthen; 3. Derives: Derives are considered of causes and stimulus of will and consequently are considered as one of footstones of human actions; 4. Sin: Sin causes disorder in the process of action issuance due to its unfavorable dispositions of souls, absorption of satanic derives and it also can be an obstacle and sign of epistemic impairment;5. Fanaticism: it is the cause of action issuance which stems from formation of those perceptions similar to one&#8217;s own. 6. Custom:&#160; when added to imagination, custom creates an imaginary pleasure which leads to a lot of action. 7. Human nature: According to obtained definition, human nature includes all actions which accord to temperament and its doer doesn&#8217;t have effective awareness about the action, such as breathing, heartbeat, vegetal actions, temper, etc.&#160;</Abstract>


</Article>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>عطاء الله رفیعی آتانی</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>The Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Fundamental Researches on Humanities</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2476-745x</Issn>
<Volume>2</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus = "ppublish">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>


	<ArticleTitle>Structure of personality based on Islamic sources in trait approach paradigm (report of qualitative study)</ArticleTitle>
	<FirstPage>105</FirstPage>
	<LastPage>142</LastPage>
	<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
	<Author>
	<FirstName>Mohammad Sadegh </FirstName>
	<LastName>Shojaei</LastName>
	<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Al-Mostafa International University</Affiliation>
	 </Author>


</AuthorList>
<Abstract>Abstract
This study aimed to collect personality traits and find personality structure from Islamic sources. In doing so, investigating Islamic sources (Holy Qoran, Hadiths, and the Islamic ethics books) around 25000 words were collected and after removing recurring and vague cases and of biological, ritualistic, and temporary states, a list of 103 trait words based on experts in Islamic sources were created. In the next phase, semantic relations between words in regards of meaning inclusion, antonymy, synonymy, using two methods of component analysis and structural semantics were investigated and as a result synonymous and antonymous, general and definite, original and sub-original, convergent and divergent, single-center and multi-center were distinguished. Results of this phase of study indicated that some traits have synonyms and some have antonymy; also, two opposing traits correspond to one semantic area because they locate on one continuum. Finally, with locating co-area words, all of the 103 words collected in the previous phase have been categorized in 15 lexical sectors. In addition, I tried to distinguish in each sector the central and basic dispositions from the peripheral and exterior dispositions. Eventually, results if qualitative study using language semantics method and conceptual correlations of words resulted in 15 dispositions or super-traits as main personality factors: collectedness, tranquility, bigheartedness, friendliness, gentleness, tractability, commitment, happiness, gregariousness, chastity, perseverance, cleverness, humility, bond-seeking, and accountability.</Abstract>


</Article>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>عطاء الله رفیعی آتانی</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>The Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Fundamental Researches on Humanities</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2476-745x</Issn>
<Volume>2</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus = "ppublish">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>


	<ArticleTitle>Research needs assessment in Islamic psychology</ArticleTitle>
	<FirstPage>143</FirstPage>
	<LastPage>182</LastPage>
	<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
	<Author>
	<FirstName>Hamid</FirstName>
	<LastName> mahdizadeh </LastName>
	<Affiliation>. Masters in educational psychology, Al-Mostafa International University</Affiliation>
	 </Author>


	<Author>
	<FirstName>Alireza</FirstName>
	<LastName> Fazeli-Mehrabadi</LastName>
	<Affiliation>Masters in family therapy, Shahid Beheshti University</Affiliation>
	 </Author>


	<Author>
	<FirstName>Seyed Mohammad </FirstName>
	<LastName>Gharavi</LastName>
	<Affiliation>Associate professor, Research Institute of Hawzah and University</Affiliation>
	 </Author>


	<Author>
	<FirstName>Masoud </FirstName>
	<LastName>Azarbayjani</LastName>
	<Affiliation>Associate professor, Research Institute of Hawzah and University</Affiliation>
	 </Author>


</AuthorList>
<Abstract>Abstract
This study aimed to identify research priorities in Islamic psychology, so that by providing accurate and enough data, an effective step towards research planning and conducting prioritized research will be done. This is a qualitative study and a combination of survey, context analysis, and Delphi methods. Statistical population in identifying the needs is all archival, human, and organizational resources in the field of Islamic psychology. The statistical population in prioritizing includes all of the experts of Islamic psychology and the statistical sample in identifying the needs include 502 archival, human, and organizational resources. Statistical sample in prioritizing phase for each of the 14 questionnaires designed in various psychological fields includes 35 experts that were selected based on their expertise through purposeful sampling. The results includes attaining 311 research topic in Islamic psychology in 14 psychology fields, of these 60 were at the priority A (very high priority), 140 were at the priority B (high priority), 83 were at the priority C (moderate priority), and 28 were at the priority D (low priority). Most of the topics with priorities A and B were in positive psychology, social psychology, and family psychology. Fewest topics with priorities A and B were in psychopathology, psychometrics, and research methods.</Abstract>


</Article>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>عطاء الله رفیعی آتانی</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>The Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Fundamental Researches on Humanities</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2476-745x</Issn>
<Volume>2</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus = "ppublish">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>


	<ArticleTitle>Kindness as a basis of security Review of place of kindness in Velai security system</ArticleTitle>
	<FirstPage>183</FirstPage>
	<LastPage>204</LastPage>
	<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
	<Author>
	<FirstName>Hadi </FirstName>
	<LastName>Masoumi Zare </LastName>
	<Affiliation>Ph.D. student in regional studies in Tehran University</Affiliation>
	 </Author>


</AuthorList>
<Abstract>Abstract
Security is one of the basic concerns of mankind from his birth. Interior security has got from different branches that quality of relation among leaders and people are the most important
From the point of purpose and following aims, we can divide political systems in two groups. Secular Functionalism and Velai Perfectionism.
security in this group is getting from structure and system and the prompt relation between people and leaders are not imaginable. but in second group, security based on two factors : Faithfully Belief of people to religious values and kindly relations among the different parts of&#160; the system, which would guarantee the security in Velai community
in other word, for making security in Velai community, we have to follow these three levels of kindness among &#34;creation and creator&#34;, &#34;creation and creation&#34; and &#34;creation and Vali &#34; .
as a result, despite that political and authoritarian structures are having important role in making security but kindness has basic role.
This idea comes from philosophy and mysticism and then goes to political theories and after that inters to geometry of Velai jurisprudent-behavioral system and planning some basis and rules for proving the result of research.
Finally, if we ignore kindness in this system, it will cause putting security in danger. At the end, the basic point of security in Velai system will define in cultural and belief area.</Abstract>


</Article>
</ArticleSet>
