Mendeley  

Zotero  

Abedi-Nejad A R. Explanation of the Relationship between Jurisprudence of Regime and Humanities and its Role in Realization of the Modern Islamic Civilization. فصلنامه تحقیقات بنیادین علوم انسانی 2017; 3 (1) :31-50
URL: http://frh.sccsr.ac.ir/article-1-54-en.html

Explaining the relationship between jurisprudence of regime and humanities is one of the preliminaries and requisites of the realization of modern Islamic civilization. The jurisprudence of regime is a jurisprudential approach responsible for discovering and inferring Islamic governmental precepts of the Islamic society in a variety of dimensions. The Islamic civilization is the very efficient social macro-regime. Indeed, the Islamic civilization is turned into Islamic regime and this regime is based on the jurisprudence of regime. On the other hand, the goals of humanities are to have access to the goals of social system and removing the obstacles in the way. By presenting this image, one may consider four modes of relationship between jurisprudence of regime and humanities. The first one is the relationship in subject matter. Humanities are the knowledge of human affairs and social phenomena. Since inferring any precept in jurisprudence is dependent on recognizing social issues, the humanities can describe and explain the topics and issues of jurisprudence of regime. The humanities are linked with jurisprudence of regime in their goals.  The jurisprudence of regime can, by inferring the goals of social system as the common goal between humanities and jurisprudence of regime, direct the humanities. It can also validate and authorize the prescriptions of humanities. This validity and authority can establish the prescriptions of humanities in accordance with the goals of Islamic regime and the modern Islamic civilization. Besides, in the Islamic society, the religious precepts and conventions form the conventional context of the humanities. This conventional context determines the type of actions of human beings and social actors. Accordingly, human actions would be different in proportion to the difference in conventional context in any society.