XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moghadasi S M H, Omidi M. Evaluation of the theory of "philosophical anarchism" based on Ayatollah Misbah Yazdi's point of view. فصلنامه تحقیقات بنیادین علوم انسانی 2024; 10 (2) :199-199
URL: http://frh.sccsr.ac.ir/article-1-663-en.html
Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute
Abstract:   (74 Views)
Anarchism is often known as a political theory, and native philosophers such as Ayatollah Misbah Yazdi have examined and evaluated it from the perspective of political assumptions. However, in the West, anarchism as a philosophical theory has certain assumptions and serious supporters. Although Ayatollah Misbah Yazdi has not investigated anarchism as a philosophical theory, his philosophical system has a special capacity to evaluate the theory of philosophical anarchism. In this article, which is written in the method of analysis and interpretation, philosophical anarchism is described and analyzed based on the two narratives of the maximalist "Robert Paul Wolf" and the minimal one of "John Simmons" and then it is evaluated based on the viewpoint of Ayatollah Misbah Yazdi. Philosophical anarchism proposes the conflict between "government authority" and "individual free will" and opposes any political authority and obligation by favoring the autonomy of humans. Based on the view of Ayatollah Misbah Yazdi, who justifies the moral obligation based on comparative necessity, it can be concluded that individual autonomy is compatible with external authority. In fact, Obligations based on their ends originate from prior free will. For this purpose, it is necessary to examine the relationship between moral obligation and political obligation from their point of view. Also, at the end of the article, Ayatollah Misbah Yazdi's point of view in evaluating philosophical anarchism is compared with the points of view of some western scholars.
Full-Text [PDF 25 kb]   (42 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
ePublished: 2024/08/31

References
1. Christiano, T. 2017. “Authority”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
2. Dagger, R. 1997. Civic Virtues؛ Rights, Citizenship and Republican Liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Fiala, A. 2018. “Anarchism”. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive.
4. Franks, B., and Matthew, W. 2010. Anarchism and moral philosophy. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. McLaughlin, P. 2010. “In Defence of Philosophical Anarchism”. In Anarchism and moral philosophy. pp. 13-32. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
6. Miller, D. 1984. Anarchism (Modern Ideologies Series). London: J.M. Dent.
7. Simmons, A. J. 2001. justification and legitimacy: Essays on rights and obligations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Wolff, R. P. 1998. In defense of anarchism. California: University of California Press.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.